🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an event that began as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has adopted a commercial tone, expanding to include gatherings where individuals of African heritage are compensated to address predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The surge has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Month

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in winter, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The month has transformed since that time, placing less emphasis on the accounts of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and more on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the month is commemorated is a indication of the current political situation. How it progresses is a valuable example in how co-option leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a elected representative feels emboldened to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are surging in the European continent as a whole.

In the United States, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the state. A campaign to remove Black history and experience from the records is in progress. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the month symbolises how little it can be influential if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the realities of the present. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is required. An academic expert, a prof at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just discontinue events including Black History Month completely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an period that has been ineffective.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an foundation that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not shy away from governmental matters, and provides room for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is basic knowledge of the bygone era when it fails to address the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Organizations who mark it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the risks that impact society if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and reactive. Perhaps an complete renaming is necessary – Black History is Now Month.