US Men's Grand Slam Drought Is Not Fritz's Responsibility to Carry

I have some thoughts regarding the comments delivered by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's victory over the American player during the New York major quarter-finals. Look – Fritz is the United States, Fowler is from the US – and athletic competitions often encourage patriotic sentiment. A little bit of letdown would have been understandable. Instead, he invoked the continued absence of US male players at the majors: not one of them had lifted a title since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone love a storyline, me too. But come on. Even if Fritz had beaten Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was looming in the next round, whom Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he somehow gotten past that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, against whom Fritz had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven grand slams (plus the Spaniard proceeded to thrash a tired Serbian in the subsequent match). Fritz said in press following his defeat that he actually preferred his path, because it presented the chance to defeat the top three players in the sport back-to-back. He is well justified to aspire to the accomplishment; an athlete is supposed to believe in themselves. But going into that Djokovic quarter-final what other person in their right mind had the drought of US winners on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the only thing between her and consistent victories

Fritz, 28, is ranked number four in the global rankings starting this week’s year-end championships and has won his last six encounters over No 3 Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. It's likely he might take that spot for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that is as far as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a chasm of ranking points away. His top-class serve and concussive power on both forehand and backhand are sufficiently adequate to dispose of the majority of opponents on the professional circuit. When facing the handful of generational talents, however, he is often helpless. The last several seasons has seen the interesting emergence of tall, gangly athletes who can nonetheless cover the court with the surprising quickness and fluidity of smaller players. Fritz is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he seldom win a rally that the other player was controlling, and hitting a drop shot against him is usually a safe bet. That acts as a pretty severe restriction on his upside.

The American has made a several dramatic, unexpected advancements throughout his career. At the beginning of the decade, he was circling the bottom of the world's best thirty. 24 months later, he was approaching the elite ten. The previous season, he unexpectedly surged up to No 4 – and maintained the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, the Italian, and including a aging Serbian, is the highest of all. What was Fowler have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the continuing slump of American men lifting grand slams when he had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just too much and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a personal best advancement to the Wimbledon last four in July.

Fritz’s play in that very quarter-final should have been sufficient of an indication. The Serbian won in four rounds, a victory that only felt tenuous for brief periods towards the very end, when the American had survived a few match points and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The duo appeared evenly matched during the rallies, with the American earning plenty of opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But the champion saved break point after service break opportunity, extending the streak to the brink of agony. When Fritz finally did claim a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly played a terrible service game to lose his own serve once more; the Serbian had lulled him into a battle peripheral to the real battle and forced him to use far too much energy to prevail. Facing set points in the final game, his first serve floated to heaven. He prolonged the contest twice on his backup delivery, but ultimately double-faulted. It wasn’t a collapse, in my opinion, only a consequence of needing to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The match was quite compelling evidence that the American is not good enough to defeat any version of the Serbian, who lost to the Spaniard in the next round and never particularly seem like he thought he could win. This is perfectly fine – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the height of his athletic abilities now, but has acquired sufficient experience and strategic intelligence to make up for a significant portion of the drop-off. The problem is those who were expecting the American to win, and pressuring him to do so, when he was had not done anything that indicated he would.

Fritz is an asset to the tour regardless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in media sessions, exceeding almost anyone on the ATP aside from the Russian star, prepared to not just say how he feels or the strategy he felt determined a match, but clarify it. That he should shoulder the majority of the responsibility for America failing to spawn a male major champion since the last American titlist feels unfair. (Now that the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, maybe they can divide that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Group

  • The Spanish phenom
  • The American contender
  • Alex de Minaur (Aus)
  • Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Division

  • Jannik Sinner (It)
  • Alexander Zverev (Ger)
  • The rising American
  • The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it indefinitely if I fail to accomplish it,” the American informed a journalist in June of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t fulfill that objective, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's young, terrifying reign is actually extremely unlikely for everybody else. {

Christopher Phillips
Christopher Phillips

Certified personal trainer and nutrition enthusiast dedicated to helping others transform their lives through fitness.